After an extended period of deferral, Google unexpectedly announced in July that it would no longer be phasing out third-party cookies, a plan they had repeatedly postponed, most recently until 2025. Despite their best efforts, Google has faced challenges in developing a non-cookie alternative that satisfied all parties involved, facing scrutiny from regulators about their proposed Sandbox initiatives due to privacy concerns, but also causing growing concerns from the industry around the effectiveness of these initiatives and their impact on campaign performance.
Google’s ultimate choice to drop their plans seems to be in response to notable pushback from digital advertisers and industry critics who argue that the elimination of cookies will greatly affect their businesses. Although Google has made attempts to ease these concerns, the escalated pressure evidently led to them making a decision.
Consequently, Google has now opted to give Chrome users the option to select between the use the Privacy Sandbox or continuing with third-party cookies. They are suggesting “an updated approach that elevates users choice” through a new prompt allowing individuals to choose their tracking preferences across Google services.
This development may leave advertisers pondering whether they should continue to prepare strategies around the expected disappearance of cookies. After all, when a major tech company reverses its course, it might seem sensible to follow suit and discard any plans for navigating away from cookies. If cookies remain, then one could easily assume it’s simply business as usual.
However, whether cookies are present or not, it’s clear that users are increasingly seeking control over their data and tracking. Despite cookies’ continued use, there’s a notable uptick in users choosing to opt out and it’s anticipated that Google’s upcoming changes will further amplify this trend.
Because of this, advertisers really do need to start diversifying their methods beyond sole reliance on third-party cookies. To maximise audience reach and protect remarketing capabilities, it is crucial to integrate multiple approaches, targeting both cookie-accepting and cookie-averse individuals through both Google’s solutions and alternative strategies like first-party data and contextual targeting. Even with cookies remaining, advertisers’ efforts to adapt must continue to be a priority.
In defiance of doubts cast by the industry, Google maintains that its Sandbox projects can effectively target users who reject cookies, referencing tests indicating substantial (up to 97%) ad spend recovery. Still, success will require combining these initiatives with other tactics, like leveraging first-party data which is crucial to build trust with users.
By using first-party data and obtaining user consent, advertisers can create a more transparent and trustworthy relationship with their audience. This type of data is typically more accurate and reliable than third-party sources, providing deeper insights into user behaviour and preferences, leading to more effective targeting and personalisation.
Whilst this latest development from Google has changed the future somewhat, our advice to clients to adopt multiple strategies remains. Adopting new strategies that don’t use third-party cookies is not only beneficial for compliance and user trust but also for future-proofing, data quality, user experience, and gaining a competitive edge.