Earnouts, once the “skinny jeans” of M&A deals, are increasingly falling out of favour. For years, they were the perfect compromise: buyers could defer risk, and sellers had a clear incentive to deliver strong post-deal performance. But just like skinny jeans, their time in the spotlight seems to be fading—and for good reason.
At the heart of the issue is a tug-of-war over ownership and operational control. With an earnout in place, legal ownership doesn’t fully transfer until the final payment is made. For buyers, this is a logistical nightmare. They can’t fully integrate the acquired business, align cultures, or execute strategic changes without risking disputes. In fast-moving sectors like marketing communications, this delay can mean missed opportunities or, worse, a loss of competitive edge.
Sellers are also rethinking their stance on earnouts. These structures often breed conflict, as both sides struggle to agree on post-acquisition metrics like revenue, costs, and strategy. What starts as a collaborative partnership can quickly turn into a contentious negotiation, souring what was supposed to be a win-win deal.
What’s Taking Their Place?
Newer, more flexible deal structures are stepping into the spotlight. For example:
The Bottom Line
Earnouts still have their place, particularly in deals where future performance is unpredictable. But their rigidity doesn’t suit today’s demand for agility. Buyers want seamless integration; sellers want fairness and transparency. Neither side wants to be bogged down by the legal or emotional baggage of a complicated earnout structure.
So, are earnouts completely out of style? Not quite—but they’re no longer a default choice. Like skinny jeans, they’ll still work in the right situation, but only when the fit is just right.